COMPARISON OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF THE WOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY AND AUTOMOTIVE AND ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES IN THE CONTEXT OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Keywords:
quality, quality management methods tools and approaches, wood processing industry, automotive and engineering industryAbstract
The aim of the paper is to compare the effect of implementing a more extensive scope of methods and quality management approaches of the enterprises in wood processing, automotive and engineering industries in Slovakia. The automotive and engineering industries have been selected for comparison because there is a significant difference in the approach of the state support and incentives of these industries as well as they are important manufacturing industries with a significant GDP share and export rate in Slovakia. At the same time, there is a presumption of several common determinants of implementing quality management systems and the circular economy potential in comparison with the wood-processing industry. The results of performed analyses revealed the existence of significant relations among capital structure and the complexity of using the quality management methods, tools and approaches.
References
Abdi, M., Singh, A. P., 2022. Effect of total quality management practices on nonfinancial performance: an empirical analysis of automotive engineering industry in Ethiopia. TQM Journal, 34(5), 1116 – 1144, ISSN 17542731, https://doi.org/ 10.1108/TQM-03-2021-0069
Agarwal, R., Green, R., Brown, P. J., Tan, H., Randhawa, K., 2013. Determinants of quality management practices: An empirical study of New Zealand manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 142 (1), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.024
Alawag, A.M., Salah Alaloul, W., Liew M.S., Al-Aidrous, A.-H.M.H., Saad, S., Ammad S., 2020. Total Quality Management Practices and Adoption in Construction Industry Organizations: A Review. 2nd International Sustainability and Resilience Conference: Technology and Innovation in Building Designs, (Article number 9319992), https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF51154.2020.9319992
Alhamd, A.E., Yahya, M.Y.B., 2021. Relationship between total quality management and organizational performance: evidence from the UAE. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 6442 – 6452.
Al-Otaibi, S.A., 2021. Implementation of Six-Sigma methodology to achieve a competitive edge in Saudi universities. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 39(10), https://doi.org/ 10.25115/eea.v39i10.5956
Al Robaaiy, M. S. D., Al-Husseini, A. S. S., 2022. Appling the Lean Six Sigma methodology in of the cost & continuous improvement of performance. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 7(4), https://doi.org/ 10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i4.e756
Antony, J., Snee, R., Hoerl, R., 2017. Lean Six Sigma: yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 34(7), 1073-1093, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2016-0035
Babu, F., Thomas, S., 2021. Quality management practices as a driver of employee satisfaction: exploring the mediating role of organizational image. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 13(1), 157 – 174, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-10-2019-0124
Bera, S., Mukherjee, I., 2018. Advances in solution methods for optimisation of multiple quality characteristics in manufacturing processes. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 24 (4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2018.093448
Box, G.E.P., Hunter, J.S., Hunter, W.G., 2005. Statistics for Experimenters. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Bravi, L., Murmura, F., 2021. Evidences about ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 9004:2018 implementation in different-size organisations. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1954900
Elwardi,B., Meddaoui, A., Mouchtachi, A., En-nhaili, A., 2021. Towards a new maturity model of industrial performance improvement based on ISO 9001: version 2015 and VDA6.3: version 2016. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 11(3), https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2021.115013
Gambi, L. D. N., Lizarelli, F. L., Junior, A. R. R., Boer, H., 2021. The impact of quality management practices on innovation: an empirical research study of Brazilian manufacturing companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28 (3), 1059–1082. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0168
Ghicajanu, M., 2019. Techniques To Continually Improve Business Quality And Performance (I). Quality-access to success, 20, 503–506.
Jimoh, R., Oyewobi, L., Isa, R., Waziri, I., 2019. Total quality management practices and organizational performance: the mediating roles of strategies for continuous improvement. International journal of construction management, 19 (2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1411456
Kafetzopoulos, D., Gotzamani, K., Vouzas, F., 2021. Management innovation, drivers and outcomes: the moderating role of organisational size. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25 (2), https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500213
Kisel'akova, D., Hairul, H., Gallo, P., Gallo, P., Cabinova, V., Onuferova, E., 2020. Total quality management as managerial competitiveness in enterprises worldwide. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 195-209, https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.14
Knop, K., 2021. The Use of Quality Tools to Reduce Surface Defects of Painted Steel Structures. Manufacturing Technology, 21(6), 805–817, https://doi.org/10.21062/mft.2021.088
Lande, M., Shrivasatava, R.L., Seth, D., 2016. Critical success factors for Lean Six Sigma in SMEs (small and medium enterprises). The TQM Journal, 28(4), 613-635, https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2014-0107
Lind, D. A., 2020. Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics. McGraw-Hill. 880.
Liu, H. M., Wu, S., Zhong. C. W., Liu, Y., 2021. An empirical exploration of quality management practices and firm performance from Chinese manufacturing industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32 (15–16), 1694–1712, https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1769474
Marcysiak, A., 2021. Customer service quality management on the courier services market. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9 (1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.1(11)
Mizanbekova, S., Umbetaliev, N., Aitzhanova, A., Bogomolov, A., 2017. The quality management system improvement for the enhancement of production competitiveness. Espacios 38(42), ISSN 07981015
Neves, F. O., Salgado, E. G., Beijo, L. A., Lira, J. M. S., Ribeiro, L. H. M. S., 2021. Analysis of the quality management system for automotive industry- ISO/TS 16949 in the world. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 32 (1-2), 153 – 176, https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1538776
Nenadál, J., Plura, J., Noskievičová, D., Vykydal, D., Hofbruckerová, Z., Tošenovský, F., Klaput, P., 2018. Management kvality pro 21. století. Management Press, 368, ISBN 978-89-7261-561-2.
Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., Cavanagh, R. R., 2002. Zavádíme metodu Six Sigma. Brno:TwinsCom, ISBN 80-238-9289-4.
Ondra, P., 2021. Managing Quality in Industrial Companies: The Empirical Study of Quality Management Systems in the Czech Republic. Serbian Journal of Management 16(1), 251 – 266, https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm16-24507
Ribeiro, L.H.M.D., Beijo, L.A., Salgado, E.G., Nogueira, D.A., 2019. Modelling of ISO 9001 certifications for the American countries: a Bayesian approach. Total Quality Management & Business excelence, 32(11-12), p.1290-1315, https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1696672,
Sader, S., Husti, I., Daróczi, M., 2019. Quality Management Practices in the Era of Industry 4.0. Journal Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej Zarządzanie, 35, https://doi.org/10.17512/znpcz.2019.3.10
Sahoo, S., 2021. Process quality management and operational performance: exploring the role of learning and development orientation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2020-0398
Sarb, A., Glevitzky, I., Itul, L., Popa, M., 2019. The improvement of quality management system in a porcelain factory. MATEC Web of Conferences Vol. 290, Article number 05003, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929005003
Shafiq, M., Lasrado, F., Hafeez, K., 2019. The effect of TQM on organisational performance: empirical evidence from the textile sector of a developing country using SEM. Total quality management & business excellence, 30 (1–2), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1283211
Su, HC., Kao, TW., Linderman, K., 2020. Where in the supply chain network does ISO 9001 improve firm productivity? European Journal of Operational Research, 283(2), 530-540, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.042
U-Dominic, Ch. M., Okwu, M. O., Tartibu, L. K., Enarevba, D. R., 2021. Systematic literature review of six sigma philosophy in manufacturing operations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 1084 – 1095, ISBN 978-179236125-8
Uluskan, M., 2020. Enhancing Six Sigma Understanding: Insights into Various Dimensions and Aspects of Six Sigma. Engineering Management Journal, 33(4), https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806
Wu, S. J. H., 2020. Assessing the individual and synergistic effects of quality management practices on operations performance. International journal of productivity and performance management, 69 (2), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2018-0217
Yadav, N., Mathiyazhagan, K., Kumar, K., 2019. Application of Six Sigma to minimize the defects in glass manufacturing industry A case study. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(4), 594-624, https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-11-2018-0102
Zandi, G., Singh, J., Mohamad, S., Ehsanullah, S., 2020. Ownership structure and firm performance. International Journal of Financial Research, 11 (2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n2p293
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal publishes in an open access model. It provides immediate open access to its content under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license. Authors who publish with this Journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned Creative Commons BY 4.0 license. See the Open Access License document.
