TECHNOLOGICAL GOODNESS INDEX FOR FURNITURE DESIGN

Authors

  • Anna Jasińska Poznań University of Life Sciences
  • Maciej Sydor Poznań University of Life Sciences
  • Grażyna Niedziela Poznań University of Life Sciences
  • Laura Slebioda Poznań University of Life Sciences

Keywords:

technological quality assessment, standardization, dimensional optimization, technological indexes in the furniture industry, Product Data Management system

Abstract

Managing an ever-growing number of components is technologically challenging for furniture manufacturers; therefore, minimizing produced components' "dimensional entropy" is necessary. A novel method to assess how dimensional decisions made during furniture design influence the growth of the components' dimensional entropy is proposed in the article. The dimensions of each newly designed element were compared to a specific set of preferred dimensions. This approach facilitates furniture design using dimensionally unified components. The Jaccard coefficient for fuzzy sets was employed to achieve it. The obtained similarity score was called the "technological goodness index" (TGI) of furniture.This index can be calculated at three levels: for a group of furniture items, a single piece, and the furniture components. Using the TGI in the CAD, manufacturers gain insight into their newly designed products' "technological" quality. By analyzing this data, designers can create furniture that boosts production efficiency, promotes productivity, and cost savings.

References

Bajusz, D., Rácz, A., Héberger, K., 2015. Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations?.J Cheminform 7(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0069-3

Behara, K. N. S., Bhaskar, A., Chung, E., 2020. A novel approach for the structural comparison of origin-destination matrices: Levenshtein distance. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 111: 513-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.005

Blecker, T. and Nizar A., 2007. The Development of a Component Commonality Metric for Mass Customization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54(1):70–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.889068

Boyce, R. L. and Ellison P. C., 2001. Choosing the best similarity index when performing fuzzy set ordination on binary data. Journal of Vegetation Science 12(5): 711-720. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236912

Collier, D. A., 1981. The Measurement and Operating Benefits of Component Part Commonality.. Decision Sciences 12(1):85–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1981.tb00063.x

Costa, L., 2021. Further Generalizations of the Jaccard Index. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2110.09619

Durak, B., 2011. A classification algorithm using Mahalanobis distance clustering of data with applications on biomedical data sets. M.S. - Master of Science, Middle East Technical University.

Gómez, R., José, E., Hernández, E,, Rivera-Gómez, H., Pamucar, D., 2021. Production Planning of a Furniture Manufacturing Company with Random Demand and Production Capacity Using Stochastic Programming. PLOS One 16(6):e0252801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252801

Grzegorzewska, E., Sedliačiková, M., Behún, M., Drábek, J., 2020. Evaluating the international competitiveness of Polish furniture manufacturing industry in comparison to the selected EU countries. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen (62(2)). https://doi.org/10.17423/afx.2020.62.2.14

Hitka, M.,Miklošík, A., Gejdoš, M., Starchoň, P., 2024. Insights into Consumer Preferences and Purchasing Behaviour for Wooden Bed Furniture in Slovakia. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 76:103613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103613

ISO 3. 1973. Preferred Numbers, Series of Preferred Numbers. Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO 17. 1973. Guide to the Use of Preferred Numbers and of Series of Preferred Numbers. Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO 445. 2013. Pallets for materials handling. Vocabulary. Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO 497. 2002. Guide to the choice of series of preferred numbers and of series containing more rounded values of preferred numbers. Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO 2848. 1984. Building construction. Modular coordination. Principles and rules. Geneva, Switzerland.

Jakulin, A., Ivan B., 2004. Testing the Significance of Attribute Interactions. P. 52 in Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04. Banff, Alberta, Canada: ACM Press.

Jasińska, A., Sydor, M., 2021. Mebel z regulowanymi szerokościami i zmienną liczbą sekcji / Furniture with adjustable widths and variable number of sections. Patent application PL439195A1. Patent Office of the Republic of Poland. https://lens.org/092-608-650-936-226

Jasińska, A., Sydor, M., Hitka, M., 2024. Optimizing Dimensions in Furniture Design: A Literature Review. BioResources 19(3): 4727–48. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.3.4727-4748.

Kota, S.,Sethuraman, K., Miller, R., 2000. A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4):403–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1320820

Łachwa, A., 2008. ‘Podobieństwo zbiorów’ / ’Similarity of Sets’. Oficyna Wydawnicza im. AFM. Kraków, Poland.

Lin, C. T. and Lee, C. S. G., 1992. Real-Time Supervised Structure/Parameter Learning for Fuzzy Neural Network. Pp. 1283–91 in [1992 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. San Diego, CA, USA.

Lu, Y., Xu, X., Wang, L., 2020. Smart manufacturing process and system automation – A critical review of the standards and envisioned scenarios. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 56, 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.010

Milton, H., 1978. The Selection of Preferred Metric Values for Design and Construction. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards: United States. National Bureau of Standards, National Engineering Laboratory, Building Economics and Regulatory Technology Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Washington, United States.

Norouzi, M., Fleet, D. J., Salakhutdinov, R., 2012. Hamming Distance Metric Learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2.

PN-EN 631. 1996. Materiały i Przedmioty Stykające Się z Żywnością. Pojemniki Na Żywność. Wymiary Pojemników/ 'Materials and articles in contact with foodstuffs; catering containers; part 1: dimensions of containers'. Polish Standard. Warsaw.

R Core Team., 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/ accesed 25 March 2024.

Rubert, C. K., Cleginaldo, P. De C., Maria, Da G. D. De A., José, G. M. De B., Nilo, A. De S. S., 2023. Development of Automotive Packaging by Applying the QFD Method. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review) 14(6):10527–48. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i6.2391.

Suandi, M. E., Amlus, M. H., Hemdi, A. R., Abd Rahim, S. Z., Ghazali, M. F., Rahim, N. L., 2022. A review on sustainability characteristics development for wooden furniture design. Sustainability 14(14), article 8748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148748

Ye, J., 2011. Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(1-2): 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.07.022

Ye, S., Ye, J., 2014. Dice Similarity Measure between Single Valued Neutrosophic Multisets and Its Application in Medical Diagnosis. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 6(1).

Tilley, A., Dreyfuss, H. (Eds.)., 2001. The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design. (Rev. ed) Wiley. New York, USA.

Zadeh, L. A., 1965. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control (8(3)):338–53.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-03

How to Cite

Jasińska, A., Sydor, M., Niedziela, G., & Slebioda, L. (2024). TECHNOLOGICAL GOODNESS INDEX FOR FURNITURE DESIGN. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen, 66(1), 125–138. Retrieved from https://ojs.tuzvo.sk/index.php/AFXZ/article/view/102